15 Comments
User's avatar
Jason Leow's avatar

The 3% rule is underrated. Can see many successful indie businesses doing well from just doing that. Same reason why we have 10 different brands of orange juice in the supermarket!

Trungphan2's avatar

Thanks for the read Jason! And totally agreed

Ken Burgin's avatar

Great issue, especially generous… thanks.

JT's avatar

Great piece yesterday, especially on the 3% rule. I only found out recently that for one of Virgil's early (first?) labels, "Pyrex Vision", he bought deadstock flannels from Ralph Lauren for $40 each, screen printed them, and then resold them for $550.

Trungphan2's avatar

Ah yes! Pyrex…didn’t realize the 13x markup!

Mostly Not Working's avatar

I like how you applied the 3% rule from the two big brands up top then to the effectiveness of memes. Basically, how humor works. Familiarity and strangeness

Trungphan2's avatar

Yes! Nailed it. When a new meme drops on Twitter…it’s all 3% riffs

Mostly Not Working's avatar

So we can also make a 3% variation on the popular meme formats to catch attention through familiarity but add novelty with the twist Will try to put this into action

Liberty's avatar

Bearly rocks 🤘

Trungphan2's avatar

Appreciation you Liberty!!

Andy Marston's avatar

Enjoyed this a lot and often refer to the TED talk on MAYA. Love how you’ve applied it here.

Admittedly my take on this campaign was to call it lazy (and push for a different perspective on activation) but I really like where you’ve taken it

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrew-marston_a-collaboration-imo-should-celebrate-the-activity-7026150356422131712-H-Zd?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios

Trungphan2's avatar

Thanks for the read. Will check out your piece 🙏

hongngo's avatar

Depends on the original product and the creator of the 3%, man. Because it's Virgil Abloh, Tiffany. If it were me with 3%, it would be different :)

Stefan von Imhof's avatar

It's interesting how porn completely skipped over NFTs.